End-to-end consistency review of the document. One polish edit
landed:
- §1 Scope listed "Person, Artist, Company, User" as binding-target
entities. Sessie 3a.5 removed `artist` from the registry entirely
(BACKLOG ARTIST-ADV-BINDING-MODEL); §1 now states "Person,
Company, User" with a forward-pointer to the appendix that
documents the v1 omission rationale.
Otherwise no polish needed:
- No stale renamed symbols in code examples (the two
`dietary_preferences` mentions remaining are deliberate appendix
content explaining the JSON-path BACKLOG deferral).
- No TODOs / FIXMEs.
- Cross-references to RFC §X / Q-ids are consistent.
- Terminology distinguishes registry (BindingTypeRegistry config +
lookup), applicator (FormBindingApplicator runtime), and pipeline
(the broader subject-resolve → conflict-resolve → apply flow)
appropriately.
Version bumped to v0.6.
Refs: WS-6 sessie 3b Task 6
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
bert.hausmans
acd7cf5ec8