feat(form-field): add form_field_options table, service, scope, cascade
Fourth and final WS-5 sibling. Polymorphic morph-owned table for the
RADIO / SELECT / MULTISELECT / CHECKBOX_LIST option rows, shared
between form_fields and form_field_library via the owner_type
discriminator. Matches the WS-5a (bindings) / WS-5b (validation_rules
+ configs) pattern one-for-one: dedicated service as single writer,
UNION-over-two-owner-chains scope, shared cascade observer.
Row shape:
- value canonical storage value (string ≤255, UNIQUE per owner)
- label default-locale display label (string ≤255)
- sort_order int unsigned
- translations JSON { "<locale>": "<translated label>" }
The UNIQUE(owner_type, owner_id, value) index ffo_owner_value_unique
is the seed-bug guard — duplicate values per field have no semantic
meaning and must fail at both the service layer (assertSpecsValid)
and the DB level.
Activity log: field.options_replaced emits on FormField subject only,
per the §6.7 WS-5a / §17.4.2 WS-5b convention that library-level
changes are silent in activity log.
No production reads yet. The form_fields.options and
form_field_library.options JSON columns remain the active source of
truth until the commit-3 reader switch — accessing $field->options
still resolves through the JSON cast in commit 1, so model tests
exercise the new morphMany via $field->options() (explicit relation
call). Both FormField and FormFieldLibrary now carry an `options`
morphMany alongside `bindings`, `validation_rules`, and `configs`.
Cascade: FormFieldChildTablesCascadeObserver gains form_field_options
as the fourth child cleaned on owner delete (both FormField soft/
force-delete and FormFieldLibrary delete).
Migration step-count tests in WS-5a/b/c bumped by 1 to account for
the new create_form_field_options_table on the migration stack.
Base scope-class extraction across the four siblings — deliberately
deferred to a follow-up work package per addendum §17.4.3 / §17.5.3.
Now that all four concrete implementations exist, the "what actually
varies" question can be answered empirically.
Tests: 1158 → 1182 green (+24 tests / +42 assertions).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
<?php
|
||||
|
||||
declare(strict_types=1);
|
||||
|
||||
namespace App\Exceptions\FormBuilder;
|
||||
|
||||
use RuntimeException;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Raised by `FormFieldOptionService::replaceOptions()` (and the
|
||||
* FormRequest validator in WS-5d commit 3) when a caller supplies an
|
||||
* options spec list whose entries violate the row-shape contract:
|
||||
* missing/oversized value or label, missing or non-int sort_order,
|
||||
* malformed translations, duplicate values within the spec array, or
|
||||
* any other shape failure documented on `assertSpecsValid`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
final class InvalidOptionSpecException extends RuntimeException
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user